Monthly Archive for January, 2010

How To Be More Transparent and Engaged Online? Ideas from Clay Shirky


The internet presents amazing opportunities – but also a lot of challenges – for organizations who have been  (until now) very traditional in their approach to external communications. The opportunity for organizations like foundations, non-profit organizations, and government agencies, is how and where to use the web for greater openness and interactivity. I was at a communications conference recently and heard a lot of questions about the challenges in doing this, as well as some interesting answers from Clay Shirky, internet strategist and author.

I was at the annual conference of the Communication Network and heard discussions among foundation communications staff that they are very interested in being more successful in their use of the web — they want to become more prominent, more credible, and more influential online.  And many of them realize that to accomplish this they need to be more open and engaged with their key audiences and with the public on the Internet.

But this all makes them nervous! They know that they can be more open and engaged online by using blogs, by sharing more of their internal discussions or information, by inviting comment and input, or by participating in social media and social networking sites – and other “Web 2.0” strategies. However, the thought of doing this worries them – because of the staff time they think it will take, and because of the perceived risk of losing control of their “messages”. Their communications work has traditionally been about crafting and disseminating carefully controlled messages – and so more openly inviting input (“but what if people say bad things about us?!”) is a big concern to them. TWD57V4YGZ76 Continue reading ‘How To Be More Transparent and Engaged Online? Ideas from Clay Shirky’

Web Accessibility as a Government Mandate?

Most web developers know that they should make their websites accessible to persons with disabilities, such as including captions for videos to assist the hearing impaired, designing navigation so it can be done through a keypad as opposed to a mouse and including descriptive captions for the blind. But too often developers choose fancy design over accessibility.  In some countries though, accessibility is no longer an option!

In a recent white paper published by my friends at G3ict (thank you again for taking me to see the Center for the Visually Impaired when I was in Atlanta last June – inspiring!), web accessibility is examined from a policy perspective. The white paper’s editor, Nimita Narasimhan from The Center for Internet and Society in Bangalore, India, examines web accessibility policies in 15 countries and the EU in terms of scope of policies and the type of policy. Scope refers to how comprehensive a policy. Type refers to the level of enforcement in place for the policy, ranging from being only suggested guidelines to legislative mandates.

Not surprisingly, few countries currently have a high scope and high policy enforcement level (see chart below), but more and more countries are adopting guidelines and are trending towards real enforcement. The white paper notes that W3C has already developed comprehensive guidelines for countries to use, but that in countries that do not use a Latin-based language, such as here in the Gulf, the guidelines often need to be customized to fit specific online language needs. Continue reading ‘Web Accessibility as a Government Mandate?’

Understanding Your Internet Audience

Many of us have had our bosses or clients tell us at some point that we need to find better ways to engage people on the internet. This mandate is incredibly vague, and truthfully, who exactly are the people online? For many of our bosses, these “online people” are one group – a collective set of engaged nerds that seem to give the company headaches through their blogs or their annoying tweets. But savvy web communicators know that the web community is just as diverse as traditional communities, and how you reach out to the “online people” needs to vary based on who they are and how they choose to engage. It’s not just about creating a blog, posting a podcast, or building a Facebook profile and assuming the “online people” will come.

Identifying or categorizing the different types of internet users is difficult though. One model I have come across that I find helpful is Forrester’s Social Technographics. This model categorizes web users based on their participation in cyberspace. I find this a great way to think about your target audiences because it helps you understand what actions you might expect them to take – if any at all. In their latest Social Technographics model, Forrester analysts Josh Bernoff and Charlene Li have 7 categories of users: creators, conversationalists, critics, collectors, joiners, spectators and inactives.

Forrester's social technographics model on categorizing web users

Forrester's social technographics model on categorizing web users

I like to keep this framework in mind when creating communications campaigns. It reminds me that I need to tailor my efforts to the different audiences – and it also allows me to manage my boss’ expectations on who can be reached online and what actions they might take.

By this point, I definitely think all organizations should have jumped into the social media world, but to have any impact in it takes more than just being present. It requires knowing your online audience and creating materials and strategies that speak to the way they interact. Definitely keep the Social Technographics model in mind!

The Content Strategist as Digital Curator

I never thought of my organization’s website as an art exhibition, but after reading Erin Scime’s article posted on the very informative blog A List Apart, maybe I should.

Erin uses the metaphor of web strategists as curators to help explain the importance of how online information and resources are shared to a web audience. When I think of all the e-content that is developed for my website – text, videos, podcasts, etc. – these truly are valuable artifacts or assets. How new and old pieces are arranged, shared and positioned is in my control, and like a curator, I want my visitors to leave having experienced something. Thinking like this makes being a web editor/strategist seem far more classy and important!

I also took Erin’s article as a reminder of the importance of producing quality content – not just throwing information online for the sake of it. Most of us can recognize bad art and I think it’s even easier to recognize bad e-content.

Definitely take the time to read Erin’s article and remember that we web strategists and editors are the new curators of the world!

Read Erin Scime’s article.